top of page

Is the U.S. Quietly Trading Taiwan for the Panama Canal?

  • Writer: Robinson Joel Ortiz
    Robinson Joel Ortiz
  • Apr 12
  • 3 min read

Updated: Apr 20


The US trading Taiwan for the Panama Canal

Is the USA Trading Taiwan for the Panama Canal?


The Canal Reemerges in U.S. Strategy


Recent developments show the U.S. reigniting its military interest in Panama. Plans to reopen Howard Air Force Base and other facilities signal a strategic response to the ongoing global supply chain turmoil and the competition for crucial trade routes.


The Panama Canal is vital for global commerce, facilitating nearly 6% of global trade by linking the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Its importance is underscored as China amplifies its influence in Latin America, investing billions in infrastructure. For instance, Chinese firms, such as COSCO, have secured operational stakes in key Panamanian ports, increasing their foothold. In response, the U.S. is looking to bolster its military partnership with Panama to counter these developments.


This renewed engagement represents a strategic shift. Historically, U.S. efforts in Latin America have focused on countering foreign influence, particularly as China strengthens its position in the region. Strengthening ties with Panama could provide the U.S. with an advantage in a theater where China is on the rise.


TSMC, Taiwan, and a U.S. Semiconductor Renaissance


On another front, Taiwan is crucial to U.S.-China relations, primarily because of TSMC (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company), the world's foremost semiconductor foundry. The stakes couldn’t be higher; however, the U.S. is quietly shifting its strategy.


The U.S. is working to reduce reliance on Taiwan for semiconductor production by developing domestic capabilities. A notable $40 billion investment is underway to build new TSMC fabs in Arizona, slated to produce advanced 4nm and 3nm chips by 2026. This move highlights a significant pivot towards self-sufficiency.


Further, the initiatives in the CHIPS and Science Act are designed to boost local production. Companies like Intel and Samsung are encouraged to establish chip manufacturing facilities in the U.S., aimed at ensuring a sustainable supply chain. For example, Intel plans to invest around $20 billion in a new factory in Ohio, enhancing U.S. production capacity.


Moreover, individual companies are pivoting too. Apple has recently moved its modem production to TSMC's U.S. facilities, showing a clear commitment to sourcing technology closer to home. This shift indicates a potential decline in Taiwan's role in maintaining the U.S.'s technological edge.


The Political Optics: Theater or Strategy?


As the U.S. reevaluates its relationships and strategic priorities, the political implications of these adjustments deserve careful examination. Critics question whether these moves are genuinely strategic or mere posturing aimed at appeasing both domestic and international audiences.


The potential military collaboration between the U.S. and Panama illustrates an acute awareness of shifting geopolitical dynamics and a need to reassert influence in areas where China is making advancements. At the same time, developments regarding Taiwan cannot be separated from the implications of growing competition with China.


This engagement in Panama may serve as a method to regain a foothold in the region while Taiwan remains on the frontlines of a technological rivalry. Thus, one must question if the U.S. is leveraging Taiwan as a bargaining chip in negotiations for enhanced control over the Panama Canal, aiming for a balanced power dynamic that encompasses both geographical and technological realms.


Implications for the Future


The unfolding intricacies of U.S. foreign policy carry significant implications. If the U.S. continues to fortify its military and economic presence in Panama while reducing its reliance on Taiwan for semiconductor production, it may usher in a complex shift in U.S.-China relations.


The landscape suggests that Taiwan could be scrutinized increasingly through a transactional lens, rather than one of unwavering support. As we move forward, the risks are high, and it remains to be seen how both the U.S. and China will manage this evolving relationship, with Taiwan and the Panama Canal becoming pivotal points.


For observers, it would be wise to consider the subtle ramifications of these shifts. A diversion of focus from Taiwan could potentially embolden China, making it essential for the U.S. to develop vigilant strategies in response.


The Overall Picture


As military interests in Panama rise and semiconductor investments gain momentum in the U.S., one must ponder: Is Taiwan simply becoming another piece on the geopolitical chessboard? As the situation continues to develop, the future of these relationships remains uncertain, and the balance of power between the U.S. and China will depend heavily on strategic territories like Taiwan and the Panama Canal.


This ongoing situation highlights the complexities of modern geopolitics. Loyalties and dependencies can change in an instant, altering long-standing alliances and global power dynamics. It will be crucial for the U.S. to navigate this evolving landscape carefully to secure its economic and military future.




bottom of page